RESEARCH AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
THE EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPACT OF THREE CONSTITUTION BUILDING
INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA: South African Human Rights
Commission, Commission for Gender Equality, The Public
Protector
by Cedric Loots, Researcher (June 2007)
Abstract:
With the advent of democracy in South Africa in 1994, the
need to create and promote a culture of human rights and to
demonstrate the value of for such rights, were some of the
biggest challenges facing the country. Thirteen years later,
South Africa has made great progress in transforming both
the state and society to ensure the observance and respect
for all fundamental rights and freedoms.
The Constitution and national legislation make provision
for the establishment of institutions to support
constitutional democracy. Known as Chapter Nine
institutions
(Chapter Nine institutions: The Public Protector; South African Human Rights Commission; Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities; Commission for Gender Equality; Auditor-General; and The Electoral Commission), these bodies
are mandated to oversee the fulfilment, promotion,
protection and respect of human rights in South Africa.
As a strong player in the human rights field in South and
Southern Africa, HURISA believes that national human rights institutions
have a critical role to play in protecting and promoting
human rights, and thereby advancing democratic practice. It
is partly with these reasons in mind that HURISA embarked on
this project to research how well the Chapter Nine
institutions in South Africa were fulfilling their
constitutional and legislative mandate.
Objectives of the study
This study focused on only three of of the Chapter Nine
institutions,
namely the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), the
Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) and the Public
Protector (PP). These three bodies play a vital role in
promoting the protection of, and respect for, human rights
in South Africa. In addition, these institutions must
address and find solutions to the glaring social and
economic inequalities that continue to bedevil South Africa,
besides monitoring government departments on their progress towards
the realisation of all constitutional rights.
The objectives of this study were -
to examine
the extent to which the three institutions are fulfilling
their constitutional mandate;
to identify and isolate
possible factors that may inhibit these institutions from
fulfilling their mandate;
to assess the functioning of these
institutions by examining internal and external structural
factors that may influence them; and
to mobilise as many
role players as possible in South Africa to contribute to,
and engage in, the on-going debate about the Chapter Nine
institutions.
Summary of Findings
1. One of the most striking aspects
of the three Chapter Nine institutions
is that their recommendations are not
binding or enforceable against the
state. They are merely advisory. This
means that in practice, state
departments may choose to either
implement or ignore such recommendations
in the absence of threats of litigation
by the constitutional bodies.
2. The Chapter Nine institutions have
not used their powers of subpoena and
litigation effectively. It is vital for
these bodies to make more and better use
of these powers in order to put pressure
on the state to deliver on its
political, social and economic
obligations.
3. The Chapter Nine institutions are
more reactive rather than proactive in
their work. A perception exists among
many community members that the Human
Rights Commission only reacts after
issues of human rights violations have
been highlighted in the media. On the
other hand, the Commission for Gender
Equality and the Public Protector are
largely invisible at the local level.
4. There are no indicators or
benchmarks used by the Human Rights
Commission to measure the state’s
progress in realising social and
economic rights (e.g. shelter, food and
health care).
5. The Commission for Gender Equality
needs a stronger and more unified
leadership in order to increase both its
efficiency and visibility. Its
commissioners lack a common agenda and
this has contributed to the Commission’s
lack of clarity regarding its identity
and role on matters of gender advocacy
in South Africa.
6. A strong perception exists that
the Public Protector only handles high
profile political cases, and has little
regard for ordinary matters.
7. There is potential overlap in the
work of these Chapter Nine institutions
and particularly between the work of the
Human Rights Commission and that of the
Commission for Gender Equality.
8. Many provincial offices of the
Chapter Nine institutions lack
sufficient financial and human resource
capacity.
9. The appointment process for
commissioners is dominated by the ruling
African National Congress which leads to
a perception that the commissions are
not completely independent of government
influence.
10. Funding for the Chapter Nine
institutions is transferred from
parliament through the Department of
Justice to the commissions. This has
resulted in many respondents arguing
that this funding model compromises the
independence of the institutions.
11. The Chapter Nine institutions are
not accessible to the majority of people
particularly in the poor, rural and
marginalised areas.
12. Relations between the Chapter
Nine institutions and civil society
organisations are informal, ad-hoc and
weak.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[NOTE: The South African government appointed
a multi-party ad-hoc committee on 21 September 2006 to
undertake a review of these institutions. The committee
presented its report to Parliament in August 2007 for
consideration and adoption.]
Abstracts from some research conducted at
HURISA (ISPV).
Toward Truth and Reconciliation: The
role of South Africa’s Goldstone Commission, 1991-1994 (2006)
by
James O Gump, Professor of History,
University of San Diego (2006)
Abstract:
In an era in which domestic spying, indefinite detention, and legally-sanctioned torture are employed in the interests of
"national security", a brief review of South Africa's transition from apartheid to democracy might serve as an important reminder of the dangers of an unfettered state security apparatus. One of the key episodes in the South African transition was the establishment of the Standing Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation—also known as the Goldstone Commission—in October 1991. Led by Justice Richard Goldstone, who has also served as the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, the Goldstone Commission made the first major breakthrough on third force activities of South Africa's security forces carried out in the 1980s and early 1990s. Specifically, the Goldstone Commission unveiled the operations of Vlakplaas, a unit of the South African Security Police that utilized surrogates to commit political murders during apartheid as well as during the transition to democracy. These revelations pierced the seemingly impregnable edifice of South Africa's state security establishment and facilitated the transition to democracy in April 1994. The Goldstone Commission's focus on shedding light on gross human rights violations also set the stage for the national Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which met between 1995 and 1998.
This paper, based in part on an examination of the original reports of the Goldstone Commission housed in the Human Rights Institute of South Africa, will explore the background to the third force operations of the South African military and police, investigate their special relationship with Inkatha, and assess the brief history and significance of the Goldstone Commission...
[Paper presented at
the 99th Annual Meeting of the Pacific
Coast Branch of the American Historical
Association, Stanford University, Palo
Alto, California, 5 August 2006.]
_______________________________________________________________________________________
No money, no rights: Cost recovery and
girls' development in South Africa (2004)
by Jacquelyn Béasse,
Canadian intern (2004)
Abstract:
In September 2000, 189 member states of the United Nations committed themselves to the Millennium Declaration addressing the debilitating effects of poverty around the world. The Declaration set a target date of 2015 to achieve the following Millennium Development Goals:
• eradicate extreme poverty and hunger;
• achieve universal primary education;
• promote gender equality and empowering women;
• reduce child mortality;
• improve maternal health;
• combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases;
• ensure environmental sustainability;
• develop a global partnership for development.
Recognising the international importance of achieving gender equality in education, governments set an earlier target of 2005 to achieve this goal, and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) subsequently titled its 2004 The State of the World's Children report
"Girls, education and development". The year 2004 also coincided with the 10th anniversary of South Africa’s first democratic elections. Since 1994, South Africa has undergone profound political, economic and social change. And yet, while much has been written on education and the girl-child at an international level, this topic has been addressed less frequently at the South African level. As a result, this paper weaves international and national policies with case studies, research, and statistics to provide an analysis of
"girls, education and development" in South Africa since 1994.
This paper begins from the premise that for girls' development to occur, poverty and disparity must be levelled and barriers to accessing basic services must be removed. In South Africa, the three basic services of education, health and water are constitutionally guaranteed rights that are inextricably linked to girls' development. Thus, an inability to access running water in schools, for instance, can pose a significant health threat and impede learning.
The following analysis argues that the South African government's pursuit of cost recovery policies since 1994 has impaired its ability to equitably deliver education, health and water services. The result is that applying market principles to service delivery prevents vast numbers of people from accessing not only basic services, but also constitutionally guaranteed rights. This is simply untenable in a country like South Africa where devastating inequalities created under the apartheid system persist. Considering UNICEF's focus on
"girls, education and development", particular attention will be paid to the disproportionate effects that inaccessible services have on the opportunities available to the girl-child. The roles of the public and private sectors in providing basic services and upholding human rights will also be addressed.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Women's
Rights Training Manual: A facilitator's guide (2001)
by
Farida Dollie, Researcher, (2001);
Updated 2002
Abstract:
This
Manual is a step-by-step guide for
facilitators/trainers working with
women's rights and or human rights in
South Africa. The goal is to support
training activities by providing tested
approaches, activities and information
on gender and women's rights.
It gives
information on the international,
regional, conventions and declarations
guaranteeing human rights to all
irrespective of sex or gender i.e.
guarantee that women and men have equal
rights, and that women's rights are human
rights.
It also gives
information on the South African
constitution, the Bill of Rights and
specific legislation designed to advance
the rights of women and prohibit unfair
discrimination.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Marching to a different tune: the Regulation of Gatherings Act and the changing face of free assembly (1994)
by
Institute for the Study of Public
Violence, (1994)
Abstract:
Mass
gatherings and demonstrations have
assumed a position of great prominence
in South Africa's political landscape.
Since the legislative birth of Apartheid
thousands of disenfranchised citizens
have gathered in numbers to register
their objection to governmental actions
which have denied them their fundamental
human rights. Public gatherings have
therefore become historically associated
with the deep conflict which has existed
between the government and the majority
of South Africans. Consequently the
government has, in the past, greeted
mass demonstrations with antagonism and
sought to prohibit those which question
either its authority or its policies.
Furthermore, the security forces have on
countless occasions resorted to armed?
and at times deadly force, to prevent
gatherings from occurring.
The birth of a new South Africa in
which fundamental human rights are
constitutionally protected, affords a
democratic government the opportunity to
develop an altogether new approach to
mass gatherings. Instead of viewing
protests and demonstrations with
suspicion, a new government can embrace
them as a necessary and important part
of a vibrant democracy. Instead of
forcibly dispersing those who gather to
articulate their views, local
authorities in conjunction with the
security forces, can facilitate their
movement so as to prevent harm and
inconvenience to both protesters and the
general public alike.
The birth of a democratic order does
however present its own set of difficult
dynamics. While mass gatherings aimed at
registering some form of complaint
against the government will always
occur, demonstrations which seek to
protest against the actions and policies
of other parties and groupings are now
likely to occur more often. The tragic
events in Johannesburg on 28 March 1994,
less than a month away from the April
elections, have revealed the palpable
dangers associated with public
gatherings during volatile times of
change. On that day thousands of
supporters of the Zulu king converged on
the city centre to display support for
the constitutional recognition of the
king in a democratic South Africa. Fifty
five people died in violence associated
with the gathering, sending shock waves
throughout the country and the
international community. This
demonstrates again how vitally important
it has become to implement a just and
responsible system to regulate public
gatherings.
The Regulation of
Gatherings Act No. 205 of 1993 is an
attempt to devise such a system. The Act
is a product of a process embarked upon
by the Goldstone Commission. The
Commission established a committee to
consider and report on: the procedures
to be followed in the planning of a
gathering, the procedures which
organisers should follow before, during
and after gatherings, the norms of
behaviour of the participants in the
gathering, the role of the police and
security forces and the adequacy of
present legislation relating to mass
gatherings. The Committee then appointed
an International Panel of Experts to
assist them in their research. The
International Panel then published a set
of suggestions with regard to the
holding of public gatherings which the
Committee in turn converted into a draft
bill. The Bill was circulated for public
comment, subsequently amended, and was
promulgated on 28 January 1994 in the
Government Gazett (No. 15446)...
This paper is
designed to perform two tasks. The first
is broadly informative. It is designed
to inform key actors involved in the
organisation, planning and control of
public gatherings of their respective
rights and duties. It will outline the
important provisions of the Act and
provide an overview as to how the Act
will work in practice. The second task
is more analytic. The Act will be
examined in the context of the current
social and political conditions in which
it will be implemented. It will be
considered whether it has managed to
straddle the often competing
considerations of the right to
demonstrate and the rights of the public
at large. This section will probe
whether the Act takes sufficient
cognisance of the volatile conditions
likely to exist in the run-up to
elections and beyond.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Securing the Trains? An analysis of train violence and the Goldstone Commission reports (1994)
by
Mark Shaw and Jamie Miller, Institute for the Study of Public
Violence, (1994)
Abstract:
Violence on trains in the PWV region of South Africa has claimed over 515 lives in the past two years. Very little, however, has been specifically written about violence on the trains. The two Goldstone Commission reports on the subject are a noticeable exception to this. Further, since the Commission has the investigative power and ability to suggest recommendations to end violence, the recommendations of the Commission's train reports need to be examined in some detail.
The first interim report was released by the Commission in July 1992 and the final report in May 1993. Thus, to date, there has been a considerable period of time in which the recommendations could be implemented. But, have the recommendations made by the Commission in regard to train violence been seen as appropriate by those directly engaged in ending the violence? Alternatively, have the parties concerned had access to the recommendations? And importantly, to what degree have the recommendations been implemented at all?
The aim of this report then is largely three fold: to provide a brief outline and explanation of the violence on the trains in the PWV since 1990; to offer a detailed examination of the extent to which the recommendations of the Goldstone Commission in relation to train violence have been followed up; and more generally, since much of what the report covers is ongoing, its contents should not be seen as a definitive outline of the subject, but rather a contribution to the ongoing debate.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|